نقش دولت در گذار توسعه ای هنگ‌کنگ

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 علوم سیاسی-دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی-دانشگاه تهران-تهران-ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تبریز،تبریز، ایران

10.22034/jeds.2026.69677.1902

چکیده

هدف پژوهش: این پژوهش می‌کوشد با روش تحلیلی و با بهره‌گیری از داده‌‌های اسنادی به بررسی نقش دولت در گذار توسعه‌ای هنگ‌کنگ و چگونگی ایفای نقش سیاستگذاری توسعه‌ای توسط دولت و ویژگی‌های چنین دولتی بپردازد و با واکاوی اجزای این دولت بدانیم که چه چیزی باعث شد تا دولت هنگ‌کنگ بتواند ایفا گر نقشی کلیدی در این گذار توسعه‌ای باشد. سوال اصلی تحقیق عبارت است از: نقش دولت در گذار توسعه‌ای هنگ‌کنگ چه بوده است و این دولت دارای چه ویژگی‌هایی است که توانست گذار توسعه‌ای را راهبری کند؟
روش پژوهش: داده‌ها به روش تحلیل متن تحلیل شده و مباحث گذار توسعه‌ای و دولت توسعه‌گرا ادبیات نظری تحقیق حاضر را تشکیل می‌دهند.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که توسعه فراتر از رشد اقتصادی بوده و مستلزم تغییرات رادیکال در نظام اجتماعی و صنعتی شدن از طریق نقش و کارکرد منحصر به فرد و ویژه دولتی توسعه خواه است. هنگ‌کنگ نیز با نقش آفرینی ویژه دولت و با استفاده از کلان مولفه‌هایی مانند عدم مداخله‌گرایی مثبت، اصل بازار بزرگ - دولت کوچک، ثبات اجرایی و اقتصادی بسیار بالا، دولت تسهیل‌گر، مداخله ظریف و سنجیده دولت برای اصلاح و تکمیل مکانیزم بازار و نگاه برون‌گرا موفق به گذار به یک وضعیت نسبتاً توسعه یافته اقتصادی شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: دولت هنگ‌کنگ به‌این دلیل توانست امر توسعه را راهبری کند که از ویژگی‌هایی مانند نخبگان توسعه گرای منتخب هیئت نسبتاً جامعی از نخبگان اقتصادی و سیاسی و اداری و تجاری، قدرت دیوانسالاری و توانایی فنی بالا همراه با نظام شایسته سالار بوروکراتیک، استقلال نسبی از طبقات و گروه‌های اجتماعی و همزمان رابطه ویژه و هدفمند با بخش خصوصی تجاری، مدیریت جامعه مدنی پرتحرک و قوی، مشروعیت عملکردی و توانایی بالا در مدیریت موثر منافع اقتصادی غیردولتی برخوردار بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of State in Hong Kong's Developmental Transition

نویسندگان [English]

  • saeed safi 1
  • rajab izadi 2
1 Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

This research attempts to examine the role of the government in Hong Kong's developmental transition using analytical methods and documentary data, and how the government plays the role of developmental policymaking and the characteristics of such a government. By analyzing the components of this government, we can understand what made the Hong Kong government play a key role in this developmental transition. The main question of the research is: What has been the role of the government in Hong Kong's development path and what characteristics does this government have that enabled it to guide the developmental transition? The data were analyzed using text analysis, and the discussions of developmental transition and developmental government constitute the theoretical literature of the present study. The research findings show that development goes beyond economic growth and requires radical changes in the social system and industrialization through the unique and special role and function of the developmental state. Hong Kong has also succeeded in transitioning to a relatively developed economic state by playing a special role of the state and using macro-components such as positive non-interventionism, the principle of big market-small government, very high executive and economic stability, a facilitating state, subtle and deliberate government intervention to reform and complement the market mechanism, and an outward-looking outlook. The Hong Kong government was able to lead development because it had characteristics such as a development-oriented elite selected from a relatively comprehensive group of economic, political, administrative, and business elites, bureaucratic power and high technical ability along with a meritocratic bureaucratic system, relative independence from social classes and groups and at the same time a special and purposeful relationship with the private business sector, dynamic and strong civil society management, functional legitimacy, and high ability to effectively manage non-state economic interests.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Hong Kong
  • developmental state
  • developmental transition
  • Hong Kong development
  • political economy of development

مراجع

بشیریه، ح. (1404). جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی، چاپ چهاردهم، تهران، نشر نی.
صافی‌اردهایی، س. (1403). تقابل سیاست و صنعت در ایران، تهران: انتشارات چاپ و نشر بازرگانی.
لفت ویچ، آ. (1400). دولت‌های توسعه‌گرا؛ پیرامون اهمیت سیاست در توسعه، ترجمه جواد افشار‌کهن، تهران: نشر پیله.
موثقی، ا. (1401) اداره امور توسعه و سیاستگذاری توسعه‌ای، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
موثقی، ا. (1396). اقتصادسیاسی آسیای جنوب شرقی، تهران: انتشارات قومس.
موثقی، س.ا. (1396). گذار توسعه‌ای در آسیای شرقی.  فصلنامه سیاست، 47 (4).
هانتیگتون، س. (1400). سامان سیاسی در جوامع دستخوش دگرگونی، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، تهران، نشرعلم.
هایامی، ی. (1405). اقتصاد توسعه؛ فقر و ثروت ملل، ترجمه غلامرضا آزاد، تهران، نی.
Amsden, A. (1990). Third World Industrialization: Global Fordism or a New Global, New Left Review. 182, July-August, 5-31.
Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s Next Giant. New York: Oxford University Press.
Asian Development Bank (2002). Growth and Poverty: Lessons from the East Asian Miracle Revisited. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank.
Bashirieh, H. (1404). Political Sociology, 14th edition, Tehran, Ney Publishing House. [In Persian]
Chan, E. and Chan, J. (2017). Hong Kong 2007–2017: A backlash in civil society. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 39 (2), 135–152.
Chang, H. J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London (UK): Anthem Press.
Chang, H-J. (2007a). Bad Samaritans. The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism. London: Random House; New York: Bloomsbury USA.
Chang, H-J. (2007b). Policy Space in Historical Perspective, with Special Reference to Trade and Industrial Policies, Economic and Political Weekly 41(7) :627–33.
Chang, H-J. (2010). 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. London: Penguin Group.
Cheung, T. (2017). Beijing will take action if city fails to enact national security law [online]. South China Morning Post. Available from: http://www.scmp.com/news/hongkong/politics/article/2120319/beijing-will-take action if hongkong fails enact national [Accessed 17 Nov 2017].
Commerce and Economic Development Bureau) 2011a). Commerce and Economic Development Bureau – Mission [online]. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: http://www. cedb. gov. hk/about/mission. htm [Accessed 18 Oct 2017].
Commerce and Economic Development Bureau (2011b). Commerce and Economic Development Bureau – Home [online]. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: http://www.cedb.gov. hk/about/index.htm [Accessed 18 Oct 2017].
Commerce, Industry and Tourism Branch (2024). Policy Initiatives of Commerce, Industry and Tourism Branch. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Countryeconomy (2025). Reports and data related to the Hong Kong economy. Available from: https://countryeconomy. com/gdp/hong-kong.
Economist Intelligence Unit (2016). Democracy Index 2016. London, UK: Economist Intelligence Unit.
Evans, P. B. (1985). Transnational Linkages and the Economic Role of the State: An Analysis of Developing and Industrialized Nations in the Post-World War II Period. In: P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–226.
Evans, P. B. (1989). Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state. Sociological Forum, 4 (4), 561–587.
Evans, P. B. (2014). The Capability Enhancing Developmental State: Concepts and National Trajectories. In: E. M. Kim and P. H. Kim, eds. The South Korean Development Experience. London, U. K: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 83–110.
Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (2003). Financial Services Branch – About Us [online]. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: http://www. fstb. gov. hk/fsb/aboutus/welcome/index. htm [Accessed 19 Oct 2017].
Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (2013). Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau: Home [online]. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Available from: http://www.fstb.gov. hk/en/index. Htm [Accessed 19 Oct 2017].
Fong, B. C. H. (2014). The Partnership between the Chinese Government and Hong Kong’s Capitalist Class: Implications for HKSAR Governance, 1997–2012. The China Quarterly, 217, 195–220.
Goodstadt, L. F. (2000). China and the Selection of Hong Kong’s Post- Colonial Political Elite. The China Quarterly, 163, 721-741.
Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (2014). Policy Address 2014. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Hayami, Yujiro (1405). Development Economics; Poverty and Wealth of Nations, translated by Gholamreza Azad, Tehran, Ney. [In Persian]
Huntington, S. (1400). Political System in Societies Undergoing Transformation, translated by Mohsen Salasi, Tehran, Elm Press. [In Persian]
Ho, Y. –P. (2016). Trade, Industrial Restructuring and Development in Hong Kong. London: Macmillan.
Hong Kong Trade Development Council (2024). Economic and Trade Information on Hong Kong.
Howlett, M. and Lejano, R. P. (2013). Tales From the Crypt: The Rise and Fall (and Rebirth?) of Policy Design. Administration & Society, 45 (3), 357–381.
Howlett, M, Mukherjee, I. and Woo, J. J. (2015). From Tools to Toolkits in Policy Design Studies: The New Design Orientation and Policy Formulation Research. Policy and Politics, 43 (2), 291–311.
Hsu, J. (2017). State transformation and the evolution of economic nationalism in the East Asian developmental state: the Taiwanese semiconductor industry as case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1–13.
IMD (2017). World Competitiveness Yearbook 2017. Lausanne, Switzerland: IMD.
Johnson, C. A. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. 1st ed. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lau, S. and Liu, Z. (1984). Society and Politics in Hong Kong. Chinese University Press.
Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Development Studies, 31 (3), 400–427.
Leftwich, A. (1400). Developmental States; On the Importance of Politics in Development, Translated by Javad Afshar Kohan, Tehran: Pile Publishing House. [In Persian]
Li, K. W. (2012). Economic Freedom: Lessons of Hong Kong. 1st ed. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Lim, J. (2017). What you need to know about the Hong Kong Chief Executive Election [online]. The Straits Times. Available from: http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/eastasia/what-youneed-toknow-about-the-hong-kong-chief-executive-election  [Accessed 11 Nov 2017].  
Low, L. (2001a). The Singapore developmental state in the new economy and polity. The Pacific Review, 14 (3), 411–441.
Low, L. (2001b). The Political Economy of a City-State: Government Made Singapore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Low, L. (2003a). Sustaining the competitiveness of Singapore Inc in the knowledge-based global economy. In: R. S. Rajan, ed. Sustaining Competitiveness in the New Global Economy: The Experience of Singapore. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 135.
Low, L. (2003b). Singapore Inc: A success story. Journal of International Affairs, 10 (1), 49–63.
Low, L. (2006). The Political Economy of a City-State Revised. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.
Low, L. (2001a). The Singapore developmental state in the new economy and polity. The Pacific Review, 14 (3), 411–441.
Low, L. (2001b). The Political Economy of a City-State: Government Made Singapore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ma, N. (2007). Political Development in Hong Kong: State, Political Society, and Civil Society. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ma, N. (2008). Civil Society and Democratization in Hong Kong: Paradox and Duality. Taiwan Journal of Democray, 4 (2), 155–175.
MacCarthaigh, M, Painter, M., and Yee, W. –H. (2016). Managing for Legitimacy: Agency Governance in Its ‘Deep’ Constitutional Context. Public Administration Review, 76 (3), 496–506.
Movasaghi, A. (1401). Department of Development Affairs and Development Policy, Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Movasaghi, A. (1396). Political Economy of Southeast Asia, Tehran: Qomes Press. [In Persian]
Movasaghi, S. A. (1396). Developmental Transition in East Asia. Quarterly Journal of Politics, 47(4), 1065-1083.doi:10. 22059/jpq. 2017. 222068. 1006977. [In Persian]
Mushkat, M. and Mushkat, R. (2016). The Political Economy of Constitutional Incrementalism in Hong Kong. Northwestern Interdisciplinary Law Review, 9, 1–46.
Ngok, M. (2011). Value Changes and Legitimacy Crisis in Postindustrial Hong Kong. Asian Survey, 51 (4), 683–712.
Ngok, M. (2016). The Making of a Corporatist State in Hong Kong: The Road to Sectoral Intervention. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46 (2), 247–266.
Painter, M. (2005). Transforming the Administrative State: Reform in Hong Kong and the Future of the Developmental State. Public Administration Review, 65 (3), 335–346.
Reporters Without Borders (2017). 2017 World Press Freedom Index. Paris, France: Reporters Without Borders.
Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.
Reed, H. C. (1980). The Ascent of Tokyo as an International Financial Center. Journal of International Business Studies, 11 (3), 19–35.
Schenk, C. R. (2001). Hong Kong as an International Financial Centre: Emergence and development 1945–1960. New York: Routledge.
Statista (2024). Data related to the Iranian economy. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/294233/iran-gross-domestic-product-gdp/
The Economist (2017). How Hong Kong picks its chief executives [online]. The Economist. Available from:  https://www. economist. com/blogs/economistexplains/ 2017/03/economist-explains-19 [Accessed 9 June 2017].
Tsang, D. (2006). Big Market, Small Government. Hong Kong: The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Press Release.
Tsui-Auch, L. S. (1998). Has the Hong Kong Model Worked? Industrial Policy in Retrospect and Prospect. Development and Change, 29(1), 55–79.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wissink, B, Koh, S. Y, and Forrest, R. (2017). Tycoon City: Political Economy, Real Estate and the Super-Rich in Hong Kong. In: R. Forrest, S. Y. Koh and B. Wissink, eds. Cities and the Super-Rich. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 229–252.
Wong, C. (2016). What Exactly Is Hong Kong’s Legislative Council? [online]. The Diplomat. Available from: https://thediplomat. com/2016/09/what-exactly-is-hongkongslegislative-council/ [Accessed 6 Nov 2017].
Wong, M. Y. H. (2017). Comparative Hong Kong Politics. Singapore: Palgrave.
Wong, Y. C. and Chan, J. K. H. (2017). Civil disobedience movements in Hong Kong: a civil society perspective. Asian Education and Development Studies, 6 (4), 312–332.
Woo, J. J (2015a). Beyond the Neoliberal orthodoxy: Alternative financial policy regimes in Asia’s financial centre. Critical Policy Studies, 9 (3), 297–316.
Woo, J. J. (2015b). Policy Relations and Policy Subsystems: Financial policy in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Public Administration, 38 (8), 553–561.
Woo, J. J. (2016a). Business and Politics in Asia’s Key Financial Centre – Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai. 1st ed. Singapore: Springer.
World Bank. www.worldbank.org world development indicators, various year.
Zhu, Y. (2011). Performance Legitimacy and China’s Political Adaptation Strategy. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 16 (2), 123–140.
جامعه شناسی اقتصادی و توسعه
دوره 15، شماره 1
بهار و تابستان 1405
خرداد 1405
صفحه 207-226

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار